<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 511 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, confirming the rejection of books of account, additions for unexplained cash, investments, and stock, and the enhancement of net profit. The telescoping of additions was also upheld, ensuring no double taxation. Both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 511 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, confirming the rejection of books of account, additions for unexplained cash, investments, and stock, and the enhancement of net profit. The telescoping of additions was also upheld, ensuring no double taxation. Both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>