<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 505 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326391</link>
    <description>Section 50C could not be conclusively applied to the land transfer because the assessee claimed the land was forest land and that only a right to compensation had passed, but that factual basis had not been properly examined by the lower authorities; the Tribunal therefore restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee an opportunity. The computation of short-term capital gain on sale of the shed was also found to rest on an incomplete factual record, as the material on cost and sale had not been properly appreciated; that issue too was remanded for reconsideration. No final merits determination was made on either capital gains issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 505 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326391</link>
      <description>Section 50C could not be conclusively applied to the land transfer because the assessee claimed the land was forest land and that only a right to compensation had passed, but that factual basis had not been properly examined by the lower authorities; the Tribunal therefore restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee an opportunity. The computation of short-term capital gain on sale of the shed was also found to rest on an incomplete factual record, as the material on cost and sale had not been properly appreciated; that issue too was remanded for reconsideration. No final merits determination was made on either capital gains issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>