<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1100 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing deductions under Sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(c) for disallowed commission payments and MSEB commission income. It was established that disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) increase business income eligible for deductions under Section 80P, as supported by relevant court precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1100 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing deductions under Sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(c) for disallowed commission payments and MSEB commission income. It was established that disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) increase business income eligible for deductions under Section 80P, as supported by relevant court precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>