<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1185 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181335</link>
    <description>The appeals by the assessee regarding disallowance under section 14A were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The claims for bad debts were allowed subject to the requirements of section 36(2). The exclusion of income earned by foreign branches was dismissed for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 but allowed for 2007-08. The disallowance of staff welfare expenses was dismissed, with the expenses being recognized as business expenditure under section 37(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1185 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181335</link>
      <description>The appeals by the assessee regarding disallowance under section 14A were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The claims for bad debts were allowed subject to the requirements of section 36(2). The exclusion of income earned by foreign branches was dismissed for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 but allowed for 2007-08. The disallowance of staff welfare expenses was dismissed, with the expenses being recognized as business expenditure under section 37(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>