<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that amounts received under prepaid calling services, sim process fees, and recharge fees should be recognized as income over the period of service, not as revenue receipts in the year of receipt. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of consistency in accounting methods accepted by the department in previous and subsequent years, overturning the CIT(Appeals)&#039; decision to treat these amounts as immediate income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that amounts received under prepaid calling services, sim process fees, and recharge fees should be recognized as income over the period of service, not as revenue receipts in the year of receipt. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of consistency in accounting methods accepted by the department in previous and subsequent years, overturning the CIT(Appeals)&#039; decision to treat these amounts as immediate income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>