<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181328</link>
    <description>Agricultural land acquired compulsorily was treated as a capital asset because the Faridabad Administration Complex was found, on its powers and functions, to be legally and functionally akin to a municipality for section 2(14)(iii)(a). As a result, the land lost the statutory exclusion available to agricultural land. Once the land was characterised as a capital asset and the transfer was taken to occur on the date of award and possession, the compensation received on acquisition fell within the capital gains charging provision under section 45. The Revenue&#039;s stand on taxability of the acquisition compensation was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181328</link>
      <description>Agricultural land acquired compulsorily was treated as a capital asset because the Faridabad Administration Complex was found, on its powers and functions, to be legally and functionally akin to a municipality for section 2(14)(iii)(a). As a result, the land lost the statutory exclusion available to agricultural land. Once the land was characterised as a capital asset and the transfer was taken to occur on the date of award and possession, the compensation received on acquisition fell within the capital gains charging provision under section 45. The Revenue&#039;s stand on taxability of the acquisition compensation was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>