<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 479 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the undisclosed income amount added by the Assessing Officer based on the lack of supporting material beyond the initial statement made during the survey proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence to support additions to undisclosed income and dismissed the appeal due to the absence of further evidence establishing additional undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 479 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the undisclosed income amount added by the Assessing Officer based on the lack of supporting material beyond the initial statement made during the survey proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence to support additions to undisclosed income and dismissed the appeal due to the absence of further evidence establishing additional undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>