<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1074 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Payments to RCDF and primary societies were deemed not liable for TDS. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) were restricted or deleted based on relevant judgments. The Tribunal upheld decisions on disallowances and reliance on the ITAT Jaipur Bench decision. The disallowance of Rs. 4.52 lacs was deleted as payments were for goods, not advertisement, and reimbursement of expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1074 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Payments to RCDF and primary societies were deemed not liable for TDS. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) were restricted or deleted based on relevant judgments. The Tribunal upheld decisions on disallowances and reliance on the ITAT Jaipur Bench decision. The disallowance of Rs. 4.52 lacs was deleted as payments were for goods, not advertisement, and reimbursement of expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>