<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 462 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not initiated correctly due to defects in the notice issued under Section 274 and the lack of specificity in the charges. As a result, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealing income particulars was deleted. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case but focused solely on procedural irregularities, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and overturning the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:03:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 462 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not initiated correctly due to defects in the notice issued under Section 274 and the lack of specificity in the charges. As a result, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealing income particulars was deleted. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case but focused solely on procedural irregularities, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and overturning the penalty confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>