<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 459 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The sales promotion expenses were allowed in full as revenue expenditure, and the power and fuel expenses related to the residential colony were deemed allowable business expenditures. The Tribunal emphasized the non-recognition of Deferred Revenue Expenditure under the Income Tax Act and the obligation of the company to provide facilities to its employees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:03:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 459 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The sales promotion expenses were allowed in full as revenue expenditure, and the power and fuel expenses related to the residential colony were deemed allowable business expenditures. The Tribunal emphasized the non-recognition of Deferred Revenue Expenditure under the Income Tax Act and the obligation of the company to provide facilities to its employees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>