<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 458 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326344</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the appellant had not concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars, as all relevant details were disclosed in the income tax return. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund of the security deposit supported the appellant&#039;s position, concluding that the penalty was unjustified. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the Assessing Officer was directed to act accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:03:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 458 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326344</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the appellant had not concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars, as all relevant details were disclosed in the income tax return. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund of the security deposit supported the appellant&#039;s position, concluding that the penalty was unjustified. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the Assessing Officer was directed to act accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>