<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 450 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat Credit based on invoices from a separate legal entity should be admissible only for the actual Service tax paid by the service provider, not an arbitrary amount based on company performance. The appellant failed to establish a case for complete waiver of demands and penalties, requiring a deposit of Rs. 10.50 Lakhs within eight weeks. A stay was granted on the remaining amounts and penalties pending appeal disposal, as the demand was not entirely time-barred even without the extended period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 450 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat Credit based on invoices from a separate legal entity should be admissible only for the actual Service tax paid by the service provider, not an arbitrary amount based on company performance. The appellant failed to establish a case for complete waiver of demands and penalties, requiring a deposit of Rs. 10.50 Lakhs within eight weeks. A stay was granted on the remaining amounts and penalties pending appeal disposal, as the demand was not entirely time-barred even without the extended period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>