<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 448 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326334</link>
    <description>The High Court intervened, quashing the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVSS) and directing acceptance of the declaration, subject to adjustment based on the Respondent&#039;s decision. The court emphasized that the mere proof of pendency of the reference application before CEGAT should suffice for accepting the declaration under KVSS, citing legal precedents and circulars. The judgment ensures a fair resolution for the petitioner, highlighting procedural adherence and equitable treatment in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 448 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326334</link>
      <description>The High Court intervened, quashing the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVSS) and directing acceptance of the declaration, subject to adjustment based on the Respondent&#039;s decision. The court emphasized that the mere proof of pendency of the reference application before CEGAT should suffice for accepting the declaration under KVSS, citing legal precedents and circulars. The judgment ensures a fair resolution for the petitioner, highlighting procedural adherence and equitable treatment in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>