<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 618 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181295</link>
    <description>A valid gift requires execution of the deed, acceptance by the donee during the donor&#039;s lifetime, and completion of transfer in the manner required by law. Where the deed reserves possession, enjoyment, rent, and mesne profits to the donor for life, and the instrument indicates that effective enjoyment was intended only after death, the gift remains incomplete unless acceptance is clearly shown. Here, there was no clear proof of acceptance or transfer of possession, so the donor had not divested title during his lifetime. The cancellation deed was therefore effective, and the later will was not displaced by any completed prior gift.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 618 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181295</link>
      <description>A valid gift requires execution of the deed, acceptance by the donee during the donor&#039;s lifetime, and completion of transfer in the manner required by law. Where the deed reserves possession, enjoyment, rent, and mesne profits to the donor for life, and the instrument indicates that effective enjoyment was intended only after death, the gift remains incomplete unless acceptance is clearly shown. Here, there was no clear proof of acceptance or transfer of possession, so the donor had not divested title during his lifetime. The cancellation deed was therefore effective, and the later will was not displaced by any completed prior gift.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>