<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 40 - HIGH COURT, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3001</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled that interest accrued on fixed deposits made to secure a bank guarantee for a contract work should be classified as business income, not income from other sources. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the lower courts in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 40 - HIGH COURT, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3001</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled that interest accrued on fixed deposits made to secure a bank guarantee for a contract work should be classified as business income, not income from other sources. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the lower courts in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>