<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (6) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181290</link>
    <description>A belated return filed after the assessment year was treated as a return under Section 24(2) of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944, because it was filed in direct response to the individual notice and was neither a voluntary return under Section 24(1) nor a return under Section 24(3). The Court held that a general notice under Section 24(1) did not by itself commence assessment proceedings against a particular assessee, and where no return had been filed during the assessment year, a notice under Section 38(1) was a condition precedent to valid jurisdiction. As no such notice was served, the assessment and penalty could not be sustained, and best judgment assessment did not arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (6) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181290</link>
      <description>A belated return filed after the assessment year was treated as a return under Section 24(2) of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944, because it was filed in direct response to the individual notice and was neither a voluntary return under Section 24(1) nor a return under Section 24(3). The Court held that a general notice under Section 24(1) did not by itself commence assessment proceedings against a particular assessee, and where no return had been filed during the assessment year, a notice under Section 38(1) was a condition precedent to valid jurisdiction. As no such notice was served, the assessment and penalty could not be sustained, and best judgment assessment did not arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>