<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1204 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181284</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai allowed the appeals by the assessee against orders u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03. The Tribunal found a mistake in not considering a specific ground raised by the assessee and recalled its order for adjudication. The issue related to an addition made in the original assessment, which the assessee argued had already been decided in their favor. The Tribunal held that the issue required fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer for computation of deduction. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for both assessment years, and the appeals were considered allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:51:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1204 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181284</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai allowed the appeals by the assessee against orders u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03. The Tribunal found a mistake in not considering a specific ground raised by the assessee and recalled its order for adjudication. The issue related to an addition made in the original assessment, which the assessee argued had already been decided in their favor. The Tribunal held that the issue required fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer for computation of deduction. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for both assessment years, and the appeals were considered allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>