<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 680 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on the existence of a permanent establishment in India and disallowances under section 40(a)(i) on various payments. The issue of carry forward and set off of losses was dismissed as infructuous due to other grounds being allowed. The matter of disallowance on payments to advertising and collecting agents was remanded for further consideration by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 680 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on the existence of a permanent establishment in India and disallowances under section 40(a)(i) on various payments. The issue of carry forward and set off of losses was dismissed as infructuous due to other grounds being allowed. The matter of disallowance on payments to advertising and collecting agents was remanded for further consideration by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>