<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (3) TMI 33 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181270</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to answer the referred questions because the controversy had become purely academic. It noted that the Appellate Tribunal had itself affirmed the remand direction and later passed the final effective order, so no live dispute remained for determination. On that basis, the reference was left unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (3) TMI 33 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181270</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to answer the referred questions because the controversy had become purely academic. It noted that the Appellate Tribunal had itself affirmed the remand direction and later passed the final effective order, so no live dispute remained for determination. On that basis, the reference was left unanswered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>