https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181268 Failure to appear at a fixed hearing, after an earlier adjournment request had already been allowed, was treated as evidence that the assessee was not prosecuting the appeal. The Tribunal relied on prior judicial authority for the principle that non-appearance without any fresh adjournment application can justify dismissal for want of prosecution. On that basis, and on the recorded absence at the subsequent hearing, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:46:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181268 Failure to appear at a fixed hearing, after an earlier adjournment request had already been allowed, was treated as evidence that the assessee was not prosecuting the appeal. The Tribunal relied on prior judicial authority for the principle that non-appearance without any fresh adjournment application can justify dismissal for want of prosecution. On that basis, and on the recorded absence at the subsequent hearing, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181268