https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326296 The Tribunal ruled that the refund claim was not time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the initial claim was complete, and additional documents requested by the Revenue were supplementary. The Tribunal also remanded the issue of unjust enrichment back to the Adjudicating authority for further examination, directing the Respondent to provide necessary evidence. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed only partially. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:13:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326296 The Tribunal ruled that the refund claim was not time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the initial claim was complete, and additional documents requested by the Revenue were supplementary. The Tribunal also remanded the issue of unjust enrichment back to the Adjudicating authority for further examination, directing the Respondent to provide necessary evidence. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed only partially. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326296