<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 409 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326295</link>
    <description>Services relating to information technology software were made taxable under clause (zzzze) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994 from 16.05.2008, but they were not treated as non-services before that date. The Karnataka HC rejected the argument that the activity was not a service at all prior to 16.05.2008 and noted that this contention had not been raised before the Tribunal. On that basis, no appellate interference was warranted with the Tribunal&#039;s remand for reconsideration of the refund claim on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 409 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326295</link>
      <description>Services relating to information technology software were made taxable under clause (zzzze) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994 from 16.05.2008, but they were not treated as non-services before that date. The Karnataka HC rejected the argument that the activity was not a service at all prior to 16.05.2008 and noted that this contention had not been raised before the Tribunal. On that basis, no appellate interference was warranted with the Tribunal&#039;s remand for reconsideration of the refund claim on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>