<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 519 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181266</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions under the proviso to section 145(1) for non-maintenance of registers in a Rice Bran Oil extraction unit. The dismissal of the appeal was based on the lack of substantial legal questions regarding the specific additions in the accounts, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 519 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181266</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions under the proviso to section 145(1) for non-maintenance of registers in a Rice Bran Oil extraction unit. The dismissal of the appeal was based on the lack of substantial legal questions regarding the specific additions in the accounts, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>