https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181255 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 177 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act was available and had not been exhausted. The Court declined to entertain writ jurisdiction in the presence of the alternate appellate remedy, and the petitioner was left free to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal, which was directed to consider the contentions on merits in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:16:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181255 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 177 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act was available and had not been exhausted. The Court declined to entertain writ jurisdiction in the presence of the alternate appellate remedy, and the petitioner was left free to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal, which was directed to consider the contentions on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181255