<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 651 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181259</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the income was not offered for taxation, resulting in a reduction in carry forward of unabsorbed speculation loss. The Tribunal differentiated the facts from previous judgments and held that the appellant failed to provide a bona fide explanation for the oversight in not adding the amount to the income. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on 20th Oct., 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 651 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181259</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the income was not offered for taxation, resulting in a reduction in carry forward of unabsorbed speculation loss. The Tribunal differentiated the facts from previous judgments and held that the appellant failed to provide a bona fide explanation for the oversight in not adding the amount to the income. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on 20th Oct., 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>