<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 165 - HIGH COURT , DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2989</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal by the Revenue concerning a search operation under the Income-tax Act. The Court found no substantial legal question, relying on the credibility of accounts and day book seized during the search. It affirmed the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the utilization of funds in constructing a farm house, noting the absence of discrepancies and the adequacy of accounting for cash and investments. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing factual evidence and the absence of legal uncertainties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 165 - HIGH COURT , DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2989</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal by the Revenue concerning a search operation under the Income-tax Act. The Court found no substantial legal question, relying on the credibility of accounts and day book seized during the search. It affirmed the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the utilization of funds in constructing a farm house, noting the absence of discrepancies and the adequacy of accounting for cash and investments. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing factual evidence and the absence of legal uncertainties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>