<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 394 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326280</link>
    <description>For computing exemption fee under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, the expression &quot;annual gross turnover&quot; could not be expanded to include branch transfers, consignment transfers, inter-State sales or export sales. Read with the definitions of &quot;turnover&quot; and &quot;taxable turnover&quot; and the Act&#039;s scheme, the exemption power was held to be co-extensive with the taxing power and could not be used to bring non-taxable transactions into the fee base through a notification. The court also noted the constitutional limits on State taxing power. The assessing authority&#039;s inclusion of those transactions was therefore unjustified, and the revision was dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 394 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326280</link>
      <description>For computing exemption fee under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, the expression &quot;annual gross turnover&quot; could not be expanded to include branch transfers, consignment transfers, inter-State sales or export sales. Read with the definitions of &quot;turnover&quot; and &quot;taxable turnover&quot; and the Act&#039;s scheme, the exemption power was held to be co-extensive with the taxing power and could not be used to bring non-taxable transactions into the fee base through a notification. The court also noted the constitutional limits on State taxing power. The assessing authority&#039;s inclusion of those transactions was therefore unjustified, and the revision was dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>