<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 956 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the hedging loss as speculative. However, the issue of disallowed expenses related to speculative transactions and taxable capital gains was remanded for fresh consideration, directing the Assessing Officer to apply rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The order was pronounced on December 17, 2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 956 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the hedging loss as speculative. However, the issue of disallowed expenses related to speculative transactions and taxable capital gains was remanded for fresh consideration, directing the Assessing Officer to apply rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The order was pronounced on December 17, 2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>