<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 178 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2985</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03 due to violations of Section 13(1)(d). It emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before resorting to judicial review, highlighting that factual disputes should be addressed through statutory appeals rather than Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court underscored that alternative statutory remedies must be pursued before seeking judicial intervention, ultimately upholding the rejection of exemption for the petitioner&#039;s ownership of shares in Limited companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 178 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2985</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03 due to violations of Section 13(1)(d). It emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before resorting to judicial review, highlighting that factual disputes should be addressed through statutory appeals rather than Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court underscored that alternative statutory remedies must be pursued before seeking judicial intervention, ultimately upholding the rejection of exemption for the petitioner&#039;s ownership of shares in Limited companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>