<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 682 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181227</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision to consider the additional ground raised by the assessee regarding the limitation of the assessment order. The Court affirmed that the appellate authority has the power to modify assessment orders based on additional issues, even if not initially raised. This ruling was in line with legal principles established by the apex court, resulting in the order being upheld in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 682 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181227</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision to consider the additional ground raised by the assessee regarding the limitation of the assessment order. The Court affirmed that the appellate authority has the power to modify assessment orders based on additional issues, even if not initially raised. This ruling was in line with legal principles established by the apex court, resulting in the order being upheld in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>