https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181216 An order refusing to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC is not interlocutory, because it determines whether a person will be brought to trial and therefore remains amenable to revision under Section 397. Where such a specific revisional remedy exists, Section 482 cannot be used to bypass it. If the High Court interferes in a manner prejudicial to the proposed accused, Section 401(2) requires notice and an opportunity of hearing before any order affecting their accrued right not to face trial is made. The decision also states that prejudicial interference cannot be made behind the back of the affected person. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Mar 2017 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181216 An order refusing to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC is not interlocutory, because it determines whether a person will be brought to trial and therefore remains amenable to revision under Section 397. Where such a specific revisional remedy exists, Section 482 cannot be used to bypass it. If the High Court interferes in a manner prejudicial to the proposed accused, Section 401(2) requires notice and an opportunity of hearing before any order affecting their accrued right not to face trial is made. The decision also states that prejudicial interference cannot be made behind the back of the affected person. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181216