https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181214 The Court set aside the order rejecting waiver of pre-deposit by CESTAT and directed a fresh consideration of the issue. The appellant's argument on the classification of service as a works contract, which was not initially addressed, was acknowledged. The Court emphasized the need to evaluate the appellant's application for waiver based on merit and in compliance with the law, allowing both parties to submit relevant documents for reevaluation. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering all submissions and documents in determining service classification and pre-deposit issues. en-us Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 16:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181214 The Court set aside the order rejecting waiver of pre-deposit by CESTAT and directed a fresh consideration of the issue. The appellant's argument on the classification of service as a works contract, which was not initially addressed, was acknowledged. The Court emphasized the need to evaluate the appellant's application for waiver based on merit and in compliance with the law, allowing both parties to submit relevant documents for reevaluation. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering all submissions and documents in determining service classification and pre-deposit issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181214