<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2979</link>
    <description>HC dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that delayed payments to Provident Fund and ESI made within a few days after the statutory grace period but before filing the return were allowable under s.43B. The court followed the SC&#039;s ruling that applied to pre-amendment law where contributions made before filing the return qualify for the s.43B benefit. The HC found the Supreme Court&#039;s decision directly applicable and therefore dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2979</link>
      <description>HC dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that delayed payments to Provident Fund and ESI made within a few days after the statutory grace period but before filing the return were allowable under s.43B. The court followed the SC&#039;s ruling that applied to pre-amendment law where contributions made before filing the return qualify for the s.43B benefit. The HC found the Supreme Court&#039;s decision directly applicable and therefore dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>