<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 365 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by remanding the matter for proper verification of service tax payments and documents. The appeal was allowed on remand, providing the appellant with an opportunity to represent their case before a final decision is made. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough examination and cross-verification in tax dispute cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:39:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 365 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by remanding the matter for proper verification of service tax payments and documents. The appeal was allowed on remand, providing the appellant with an opportunity to represent their case before a final decision is made. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough examination and cross-verification in tax dispute cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>