<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326246</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner, a manufacturer of liquor, to pay a fine of Rs. 2000 for the release of goods and submit necessary documents. Upon compliance, the goods would be released immediately. A revised compounding notice was issued, and the petitioner was allowed to address it in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:38:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326246</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner, a manufacturer of liquor, to pay a fine of Rs. 2000 for the release of goods and submit necessary documents. Upon compliance, the goods would be released immediately. A revised compounding notice was issued, and the petitioner was allowed to address it in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>