<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181204</link>
    <description>The department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The addition of Rs. 62,100 in interest income was restored, as the Tribunal held that the reduction in interest rate after the accounting year did not meet the conditions for non-taxability. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restore the matter of the Rs. 3 lakhs cash credits for further enquiry, criticizing the AO for insufficient investigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 13:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 612 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181204</link>
      <description>The department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The addition of Rs. 62,100 in interest income was restored, as the Tribunal held that the reduction in interest rate after the accounting year did not meet the conditions for non-taxability. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restore the matter of the Rs. 3 lakhs cash credits for further enquiry, criticizing the AO for insufficient investigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>