<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2972</link>
    <description>Additions based on alleged collections for mining licences were sent back for fresh consideration because the enquiry was incomplete and cross-examination was not afforded, but the seized material was not disregarded entirely. On the remaining issues, the Court upheld deletion of additions where cash was explained as Association collections, family-member investments were already separately dealt with, trust-related deposits lacked proof of the assessee&#039;s personal role, marriage gifts and expenses were supported by surrounding material, alleged foreign commission was not proved to have been received, foreign currency was linked to a third party, and fixed deposits in another person&#039;s name lacked a basis for assessment in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2972</link>
      <description>Additions based on alleged collections for mining licences were sent back for fresh consideration because the enquiry was incomplete and cross-examination was not afforded, but the seized material was not disregarded entirely. On the remaining issues, the Court upheld deletion of additions where cash was explained as Association collections, family-member investments were already separately dealt with, trust-related deposits lacked proof of the assessee&#039;s personal role, marriage gifts and expenses were supported by surrounding material, alleged foreign commission was not proved to have been received, foreign currency was linked to a third party, and fixed deposits in another person&#039;s name lacked a basis for assessment in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>