<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2970</link>
    <description>Processed nuts such as dry-roasted, oil-roasted, salted, seasoned and branded cashew nuts, peanuts and almonds were treated as preparations of nuts under Chapter 20, not edible nuts under Chapter 8, because the tariff structure and HSN notes specifically cover roasted or prepared nuts and exclude such goods from Chapter 8. The processes of roasting, salting, flavouring, repacking into unit containers and affixing brand names were also treated as manufacture because Section 2(f)(ii) and Chapter Note 3 deem specified labeling, repacking and marketable treatment processes to be manufacture for excise purposes, even without a traditional new commodity test.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2970</link>
      <description>Processed nuts such as dry-roasted, oil-roasted, salted, seasoned and branded cashew nuts, peanuts and almonds were treated as preparations of nuts under Chapter 20, not edible nuts under Chapter 8, because the tariff structure and HSN notes specifically cover roasted or prepared nuts and exclude such goods from Chapter 8. The processes of roasting, salting, flavouring, repacking into unit containers and affixing brand names were also treated as manufacture because Section 2(f)(ii) and Chapter Note 3 deem specified labeling, repacking and marketable treatment processes to be manufacture for excise purposes, even without a traditional new commodity test.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>