https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326211 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to present a convincing case against the established findings of evasion of Revenue. The adjudicating authority carefully considered the evidence, including clearances without proper invoices and manipulation in the production process, leading to the imposition of duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant's dilatory tactics and lack of substantial defense resulted in the dismissal of the appeal, as the authority found no merit in the contentions raised. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326211 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to present a convincing case against the established findings of evasion of Revenue. The adjudicating authority carefully considered the evidence, including clearances without proper invoices and manipulation in the production process, leading to the imposition of duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant's dilatory tactics and lack of substantial defense resulted in the dismissal of the appeal, as the authority found no merit in the contentions raised. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326211