<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 321 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating duty liability and penalty on the Respondent for clandestine removal of goods. The judgment emphasized that a party cannot change its stance on an issue once accepted, overturning the Order-in-Appeal directing a refund with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:38:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 321 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating duty liability and penalty on the Respondent for clandestine removal of goods. The judgment emphasized that a party cannot change its stance on an issue once accepted, overturning the Order-in-Appeal directing a refund with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>