<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1947 (4) TMI 9 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181175</link>
    <description>Foreign income remained taxable because the Hindu undivided family could not satisfy the statutory test of being &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; under Section 4B(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The relevant criterion was actual presence in British India for an aggregate period exceeding two years during the preceding seven years, and the family&#039;s residential status followed that of its karta under Section 4B(b). As the karta had been resident in British India in nine of the ten preceding years and met the two-year presence condition, the family did not qualify for the exemption and its foreign income was rightly included in the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1947 (4) TMI 9 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181175</link>
      <description>Foreign income remained taxable because the Hindu undivided family could not satisfy the statutory test of being &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; under Section 4B(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The relevant criterion was actual presence in British India for an aggregate period exceeding two years during the preceding seven years, and the family&#039;s residential status followed that of its karta under Section 4B(b). As the karta had been resident in British India in nine of the ten preceding years and met the two-year presence condition, the family did not qualify for the exemption and its foreign income was rightly included in the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>