<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181172</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, vacated all interim orders, and held that the Assessing Officer had acted within his powers and jurisdiction. The challenges to the notices under sections 154 and 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were found to be without merit. The court emphasized the necessity for Assessing Officers to consider all relevant provisions and record reasons while determining the residential status of an assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181172</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, vacated all interim orders, and held that the Assessing Officer had acted within his powers and jurisdiction. The challenges to the notices under sections 154 and 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were found to be without merit. The court emphasized the necessity for Assessing Officers to consider all relevant provisions and record reasons while determining the residential status of an assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>