<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (1) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181158</link>
    <description>A false explanation for money deposited in the assessee&#039;s wife&#039;s name may be rejected where the stated gift source is unsupported and the wife has no independent means. Here, the claimed gift from the adoptive father was found untenable because contemporaneous materials did not support it and the father had no available funds. On those proved facts, the Tribunal could infer that the deposit represented the assessee&#039;s own income from undisclosed sources. The result was that the finding was supported by sufficient material, and the assessee&#039;s reliance on cases involving only a bare legal presumption did not assist him.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (1) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181158</link>
      <description>A false explanation for money deposited in the assessee&#039;s wife&#039;s name may be rejected where the stated gift source is unsupported and the wife has no independent means. Here, the claimed gift from the adoptive father was found untenable because contemporaneous materials did not support it and the father had no available funds. On those proved facts, the Tribunal could infer that the deposit represented the assessee&#039;s own income from undisclosed sources. The result was that the finding was supported by sufficient material, and the assessee&#039;s reliance on cases involving only a bare legal presumption did not assist him.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>