<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1414 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181156</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. However, the appeal challenging the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was allowed for statistical purposes and remanded for further consideration. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1414 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181156</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. However, the appeal challenging the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was allowed for statistical purposes and remanded for further consideration. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>