<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 315 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326201</link>
    <description>The Court granted an interim stay on the condition that the petitioner pay 25% of the demand within ten days. The impugned order was modified to allow for an interim stay until the appeal&#039;s disposal, contingent on the petitioner&#039;s payment. The first respondent was directed to decide on the appeal within three months. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected MP was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 22:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 315 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326201</link>
      <description>The Court granted an interim stay on the condition that the petitioner pay 25% of the demand within ten days. The impugned order was modified to allow for an interim stay until the appeal&#039;s disposal, contingent on the petitioner&#039;s payment. The first respondent was directed to decide on the appeal within three months. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected MP was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>