<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 309 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326195</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, reversing the decisions of the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority. The disallowance made under Section 14A of the Act was found to exceed the exempt income and was deemed unjustified. Additionally, the notional interest charged by the Assessing Officer was overturned as there was no provision in the Act to add such interest if income had not accrued or been received by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:20:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 309 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326195</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, reversing the decisions of the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority. The disallowance made under Section 14A of the Act was found to exceed the exempt income and was deemed unjustified. Additionally, the notional interest charged by the Assessing Officer was overturned as there was no provision in the Act to add such interest if income had not accrued or been received by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>