<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 299 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, invalidating the notice issued under Section 148 and subsequent reassessment orders due to the absence of specific allegations in the recorded reasons. Additionally, the Tribunal held that once registration under Section 12A is granted, the Assessing Officer cannot question the exemption under Section 11. Errors were found in invoking Sections 13(1)(c) and 13, assessing income as business income instead of under relevant exemptions, denying depreciation on computer software, disallowing expenses, and charging interest incorrectly. All appeals were allowed, and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 299 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, invalidating the notice issued under Section 148 and subsequent reassessment orders due to the absence of specific allegations in the recorded reasons. Additionally, the Tribunal held that once registration under Section 12A is granted, the Assessing Officer cannot question the exemption under Section 11. Errors were found in invoking Sections 13(1)(c) and 13, assessing income as business income instead of under relevant exemptions, denying depreciation on computer software, disallowing expenses, and charging interest incorrectly. All appeals were allowed, and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>