<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 293 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, dismissing the appellant&#039;s challenge. The matter of deduction of liabilities was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation with proper documentation. The issue of premature penalty proceedings initiation was not individually addressed, indicating agreement with the CWT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 293 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, dismissing the appellant&#039;s challenge. The matter of deduction of liabilities was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation with proper documentation. The issue of premature penalty proceedings initiation was not individually addressed, indicating agreement with the CWT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>