<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 288 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326174</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled that the inclusion of the value of gunny bags in the assessable value of manufactured goods is not justified unless there is a specific arrangement for the return of packing materials with an obligation on the seller to refund their value. As no such arrangement was established in this case, the Court dismissed the appeals without costs, emphasizing the lack of factual support for the appellant&#039;s claims regarding the return of gunny bags.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 288 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326174</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled that the inclusion of the value of gunny bags in the assessable value of manufactured goods is not justified unless there is a specific arrangement for the return of packing materials with an obligation on the seller to refund their value. As no such arrangement was established in this case, the Court dismissed the appeals without costs, emphasizing the lack of factual support for the appellant&#039;s claims regarding the return of gunny bags.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>