<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 287 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326173</link>
    <description>Excise duty demand on Horton Spheres supplied to Indian Oil Corporation was unsustainable because the item supplied was not excisable and no excise duty was collected from the buyer. The record further showed that the amount described as duty had been deposited at the raw material stage, not on the final product cleared to the buyer. As the factual basis for levy was not established, the demand failed and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 287 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326173</link>
      <description>Excise duty demand on Horton Spheres supplied to Indian Oil Corporation was unsustainable because the item supplied was not excisable and no excise duty was collected from the buyer. The record further showed that the amount described as duty had been deposited at the raw material stage, not on the final product cleared to the buyer. As the factual basis for levy was not established, the demand failed and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>